DigiDesign D-Command Manuel d'utilisateur Page 3

  • Télécharger
  • Ajouter à mon manuel
  • Imprimer
  • Page
    / 4
  • Table des matières
  • MARQUE LIVRES
  • Noté. / 5. Basé sur avis des utilisateurs
Vue de la page 2
comes
great organisation,
right? Wrong! You have all your
tracks laid out the way you want: guitars, guitar
FX, guitar subs, vocals, vocal subs… ad infinitum.
Now when you come to mix, you have to chase all
these tracks around the screen with a mouse. Custom
Faders offers a nifty solution to this problem. If you
want certain faders grouped together in front of you
without changing the order and grouping of tracks in
the ProTools file itself, you can. Select a custom fader
group, go into assign mode and select any track in any
order from anywhere in the project! Custom faders can
occupy anywhere from four faders up to the maximum
width of the console 24 faders. Beautiful! Custom
Faders can be named to allow you to get to a focused
group of tracks with just two button pushes and
dismiss them with one. What’s more, custom faders
allows what I call ‘plug-in explode.When you select a
plug-in on a track, in the blink of an eye it takes all the
custom faders and encoders and automatically places
all the parameters for a plug-in on them, including the
parameter names under each encoder. If you want
to single out some parameters for special treatment,
such as frequency cut-off and resonance on Virus, you
can map the parameters to function via the faders,
effectively taking what could be tons of parameters
and focusing on just the five or so that you want to play
with. Take that you pesky mouse!
Slotting Together
Physically, the main D-Command module and the 16-
fader expander pack slot together and form a complete
unit that looks like a larger-format desk. Then, I/O-
wise it’s a simple matter of plugging the two compo-
nents together with an ethernet cable. I had the review
model setup in five minutes. On this point, Id quite like
to see a future version use ethernet to connect to the
Digidesign preamps. The Midi method worked fine, but
does seem a bit antiquated.
Bussing cue sends to performers is a very important
part of getting a great performance and to this end the
unit has a Cue Mix section on
the X-Mon. The assignment
of sends and inserts can be
done directly from the control
surface and there is no need
to go reaching for the mouse
(I had to keep slapping my
hand to stop myself).
Tracks can be created
and put into record arm all
from the D-Command. The
only time that I needed to grab
the keyboard was to input track
names via the qwerty keyboard.
All the various transport modes can
also be controlled via the surface.
I also tried some more esoteric
commands like importing tracks from another
session, and all of this was gobbled up for lunch by
D-Command, but I did have to resort to the computer
interface for workspace management of files etc. Plug-
in control of all the Digi-Racks gear was seamless and
I really did feel like I was beginning to get the hang
of this beast at times I forgot that I was operating
ProTools. I inserted EQ III’s and dynamics on all the
channels so that there was no need to bother with
assigning them as I went. As long as you have an HD3
or Accel system, all is okay.
I suppose it shouldn’t be surprising but I was really
struck by the difference it makes interfacing ProTools
with a Digidesign controller. As opposed to other
consoles that double as ProTools controllers, the
D-Command’s integration of Tools is seamless. And
when you combine that integration with the quality of
the controls, you really are in ProTools heaven. The
backlit buttons are excellent, the colour-codings really
help to identify functions and the touch-sensitive rotary
controls are brilliant to use. For example, there is a
great mode where the last fader in the control strip
becomes the selected fader’s channel. That way it’s
nearest to all the buttons on the D-Command so it
become obvious what you’re controlling without having
to hunt for the fader amongst 16 others.
Automation
I have always liked automation with real controls rather
than a mouse. Good mixing regularly requires you to
adjust the levels of more than one channel at a time as
it’s about the dynamic relationship between different
inputs. The mouse technique is great for trimming a
mix and setting the level of one channel to a specific
point (post FX people require this more than most).
But when you’re mixing a song it can be incredibly
time consuming relying on a mouse to get the mix as a
whole to ‘sitcorrectly. I’m sure this is one reason that
mix professionals still prefer desks such as the ubiqui-
tous SSL (sound quality issues aside). Even final mixing
for TV and film is always done with some kind of mix
AT
|
104
Vue de la page 2
1 2 3 4

Commentaires sur ces manuels

Pas de commentaire